Skip to content
Alu CNC Parts

Tools / Surface finish

Surface Finish Conversion Chart

Ra, Rz, RMS and ISO N-grade side by side, with the one column most charts leave out: what each band actually costs on aluminum.

ISO NRa umRa uinRz umRMS uinHow it is reachedOn aluminum
N125020002002200Rough turning, flame cutNot typical on a machined aluminum part
N112510001001100Heavy roughingRough pass only
N1012.550050550RoughingRough pass only
N96.325025275Medium milling, turningCheap, clearly tool marked
N83.212512.5138Milling, turningRoughing pass, no finish pass. Cheapest usable
N71.6636.369Finish milling, turningThe default. A normal finish pass, effectively free
N60.8323.235Fine finishing, reamingSlower pass and sharp tooling. Modest cost
N50.4161.618Grinding, fine boringDedicated strategy or a second operation. Significant
N40.280.89Fine grindingSpecialist. Expensive on aluminum
N30.140.44.4Lapping, honingSpecialist
N20.0520.22.2Lapping, polishingSpecialist, optical work
N10.02510.11.1SuperfinishingSpecialist, optical work

N7 (Ra 1.6 um) is highlighted because it is the default a machined aluminum part arrives at without a callout. Rz values are the common engineering approximation, not an exact conversion: the Ra to Rz ratio depends on the profile shape.

Convert a value

Nearest gradeN7

Ra1.6 um

Rz approx6.3 um

Specify it the cheap way

A general note plus named exceptions, rather than a fine finish across the whole part:

SURFACE FINISH Ra 1.6 um UNLESS NOTED.
FACE 'A' AND O-RING GROOVE: Ra 0.8 um MAX.
BEAD BLAST ALL EXTERNAL SURFACES
BEFORE ANODIZING.

Applying Ra 0.8 um to a whole part because two faces need it is one of the most expensive habits in machined part buying.

What each Ra value costs / Tolerances worth paying for

Questions

What surface finish do I get if I do not specify one?

On aluminum, typically Ra 1.6 um (N7) on milled faces, because that is what a normal finishing pass produces. You will also see tool marks and a cutter path pattern. If that is acceptable, write it down so the shop is not guessing.

Is Rz just Ra multiplied by four?

No, and treating it that way causes arguments. Ra is an average deviation and Rz is an average peak to valley height, so the ratio depends on the shape of the profile. The values in this chart use the common engineering approximation, which is fine for selecting a band but not for converting an inspection result.

Does bead blasting improve Ra?

Usually not. Bead blasting replaces directional tool marks with an even matte texture, which looks more uniform while the measured Ra often goes up slightly. It is a cosmetic treatment, not a precision one.

Need a part made to this finish?